// Twitter Cards // Prexisting Head The Biologist Is In: astrobiology
Showing posts with label astrobiology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label astrobiology. Show all posts

Monday, January 29, 2018

Astrobiology: Life on the Martian Surface

The surface conditions of Mars are, to put it politely, somewhat extreme. The air pressure, temperature, and chemical conditions at the surface would individually be fatal to our species. All three together means we could only live there with some pretty advanced technology.

The average air pressure at the surface of Mars is ~600 pascals (about 0.6% of Earth's average at sea level). At the lowest altitude of Mars, in parts of Hellas Panitia, the air is twice as thick at ~1200 pascals. This is about 3.4% of the air pressure found at the peak of Mount Everest. This is far lower than the level of air pressure at which point we require pressure suits to survive.

The temperature at the surface of Mars is... cold. The experience of the rovers we've had exploring near the equator there for the last several years give us some idea of what the temperatures are like. The good news is that temperatures routinely reach above freezing, except in winter. Temperatures that we'd consider quite comfortable are even likely during a summer day. The bad news is the temperature drops precipitously at night. A routine temperature swing of a hundred degrees Celsius would be expected. Going from 50 °F to -125 °F and back across the day-night cycle would be awkward to deal with. The further we go from the equator, the colder it is going to be.

The chemistry of the Martian surface is interesting. The thin atmosphere can't absorb UV the way ours (with its ozone layer) does, so much more UV reaches the surface (even though the sun is distant enough to reduce its intensity by almost half). That higher-energy light of UV is able to drive chemical reactions in the surface layer of soil. It can break water and generate highly oxidizing compounds, making the soil surface highly reactive to organic material. (This led to the confounding results from the Viking lander life detection experiments.)



Years of biology research on Earth, however, has shown life can prosper in a far wider range of conditions than we find comfortable.

Even if the surface of Mars was entirely uninhabitable, there can still be plenty of living organisms within Mars. Life on Earth extends to as far into the rock as we've examined, with active cells living kilometers down into the crust. If there was life on the once warmer and wetter Mars (and I'm pretty certain there was), then there is certainly life still there hiding in the depths.

Complicated electronic machine with arrays of LEDs in different colors, shining onto a sample of simulated Martian soil.
Cropped from image at [link].
How about life on the surface? People have been pondering this for a while. The air pressure, temperature, and even surface chemistry are all compatible with some potential forms of microbial life. (The reactive chemicals in the soil could be consumed by microbes to fuel their own growth.) Hypothetically, even some life forms from here on Earth might be able to survive in the nicer locations on Mars.

Some researchers have been exploring this, by sampling organisms from the colder parts of our planet and exposing them to atmosphere, pressure, and UV conditions similar to what is seen on Mars. Their work showed that some lichens could not only survive the conditions there, but would actually become used to the conditions and increase its metabolism. Over time, such lichens might be able to slowly grow and spread on Mars.



That slow growth could be their downfall. Mars periodically experiences planet-spanning dust storms. Their interval isn't known precisely, but the consequence for a slow-growing lichen on the surface could be dramatic. A photosynthetic lichen which got covered in dust for too long would cease to live.

Map of Mars, with elevation indicated by color. A red ellipse highlights a location in the left half.
Valles Marineris circled. Image edited from [link].
The lichens could probably persevere on vertical or slightly overhanging rock surfaces at low altitudes near the equator. (Perhaps in Valles Marineris.) They might be able to get sufficient sunlight and be protected from dust accumulation. From that foot-hold, I suspect lichens could evolve to handle the conditions and spread further. There are a few strategies that might work.

1) They could go into stasis and wait for local winds to clear away the dust. This is the strategy used by encrusting lichens here on Earth. (This is also how the Opportunity rover has managed to keep going so long.) Too much dust would still kill them, but rock surfaces exposed to wind would probably get cleared fast enough.

2) They could grow a surface which was smooth enough to not hold on to any dust, so the winds could shift it away easier.

3) They could grow into small, pointed spikes with a surface smooth enough that dust couldn't adhere. This wouldn't save them from being overcome by a traveling dune, but it might let them survive heavier dust accumulation. During clear-sky years they'd have to spend much of their energy growing upwards.

Dr. Ian Malcom from movie Jurassic Park.
Dr. Ian Malcom: "Life, uh, finds a way."
Dr. Me: "Unless it goes extinct first."
4) They could sidestep the issue by frequently shedding their resilient spores into the wind. This would ensure that some would land on the surface when the storm settled down. Even if existing colonies were killed with each storm season, some new colonies could be formed. Some would have to be able to grow from a spore to a size where they could make more spores in the intervals between killing dust storms.

Any combination of strategies could turn up given sufficient time, if they were able to survive in some protected niches initially. This process could take thousands of years or more. If we wanted to terraform Mars on any sort of human-scale timeframe, we'd have to be much more involved in adapting living things to live there.



References:

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Astrobiology : The basics of life.

Life as we know it is composed of three basic types of chemical compounds: nucleic acids (DNA & RNA), proteins, and lipids. One aspect of the study of abiogenesis (the origin of life) has been to determine how the basic compounds could have been formed from simple chemical precursors that we already know can be formed from simple physical and chemical processes.

One of the first experiments in to examine how the basic biomolecules could have been formed was performed in 1952 and is known as the Miller-Urey experiment. In this experiment, a selection of simple reducing gases was repeatedly condensed and boiled while being exposed to electric sparks. The experiment was setup to mimic the conditions of the early atmosphere here on Earth. The reducing gases are those that would have been generated from geologic processes before living things started adding oxygen to the mix. The sparks represented lightening, which was thought of as a plausible energy source that could drive the reactions to generate interesting chemistry.

The experiment was able to produce hydrogen cyanide (HCN), formaldehyde (CH2O), and other simple molecules. These molecules then reacted to form over 40 different amino acids, in sufficient amounts to color the condensed liquid pink after a day. Several variations of the experiment have been done that produce different mixes of small biomolecules, including all the purines and pyrimidines used in the bases of RNA/DNA as well as the ribose sugars used to construct nucleotides.

Most of these experiments required the presence of ammonia (NH4) and methane (CH3) to produce interesting biomolecules. This is a problem, because these gases are now thought to be relatively rare in the early atmosphere because of their absence in the volcanic gas emissions that would have contributed heavily to the early atmosphere.

A new set of conditions has been identified (Patel, Nature 2015) that is able to generate the precursors to amino acids, nucleic acids (sugars and purines/pyrimidines), and lipids. The key components were hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and hydrogen sulfide (HS) from the atmosphere and ultraviolet light from the sun interacting in a water (H2O) bath. The process was sped up by the presence of dissolved copper ions. Interestingly, the proposed reactions generate all the basic compounds used in our type of life, but also don't generate many other simple compounds that our type of life doesn't use.

I consider this topic to be part of astrobiology because the same basic physical processes which are studied in research into abiogenesis here on Earth have also been playing out at sites throughout the universe. The same basic compounds of life have been generated on wet worlds wherever they are found. This not only suggests that life may be ubiquitous through the universe, but that when life is found on planets like ours that it may also be composed of similar basic types of molecules.

Lots of other simple chemicals have been identified in space using spectroscopy. These have also been generated through common physical and chemical processes and may represent the basic chemicals found in other types of life that started in environments distinct from our own.


References
  1. Miller-Urey experiment: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment
  2. Recent analysis of Miller-Urey: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23340907
  3. Patel, Nature 2015: http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/v7/n4/full/nchem.2202.html
  4. Molecules in space: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_interstellar_and_circumstellar_molecules

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Astrobiology : Mars & Isotopic Analysis

Two stable isotopes of carbon are found, carbon-12 (12C) and carbon-13 (13C). Carbon-12 is the vast majority, at 98.89% abundance. Individual samples of carbon from different sources can vary strongly from the general abundance ratio, depending on where they came from.

The reactions of biology tend to prefer the lighter form of carbon, so over time biological sources of carbon tend to become relatively enriched in carbon-12 vs. carbon-13. A consequence of this is that carbon samples from a living source are distinct from carbon samples from a geological source.

We've examined the carbon ratios from many sources here on Earth. We've now also examined the carbon ratios from a few sources on Mars. A study was published in the December 2014 edition of Meteoritics & Planetary Science that discussed the examination of carbon ratios in a recently recovered Martian meteorite called Tissint.


There are significant differences in the carbon pattern between Earth and Mars. I put together the above figure from one in references #1 and #2, to better compare the known carbon ratio differences by sample type.

The carbon ratios found in carbonates on Mars suggest they are of inorganic origin. Those from freshwater or marine sources on Earth have ratios consistent with their known biological origin.

The red data-points are from organic material found in Tissint. They compare very well to the blue data-points from coal here on earth. On both planets, atmospheric carbon is relatively reduced in carbon-12 compared to the organic material. This is pretty good evidence that the organics in the meteorite came from some living thing, just as the organics in coal did.

The carbon could still have come from contamination here on Earth, after the meteorite landed. To test for this, the researchers examined the isotopic ratios of the hydrogen in the sample. Mars is enriched in deuterium relative to Earth and this same enrichment was found in the examined organic material.

This research happens to be the best direct evidence so far for the existence of life on Mars (at some point in the past). This still isn't entirely conclusive physical evidence. For that we will have to go to Mars and either find an unambiguous macro-fossil, or culture some micro-organism from one of the brine-water seeps we've been looking at from space.

I've been convinced that there was in the past (and is most likely today) living organisms on Mars, from theoretical considerations about how life works, and how it must have spread in the early solar system. However, I wasn't really expecting to see any convincing physical evidence any time soon.



References:
  1. Tissent Carbon ratios: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.12389/full
  2. Earth Carbon ratio: www4.nau.edu/meteorite/meteorite/book-glossaryc.html 
  3. Mars Carbon ratio: www.astrowatch.net/2014/12/scientists-find-new-evidence-for-life.html
  4. Organics on Mars: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141216144137.htm

Friday, May 23, 2014

Astrobiology : Biology of Mars

New research indicates that some methanogens, Archaea which breath hydrogen and carbon dioxide while excreting methane, can survive the temperature extremes currently found on the surface of Mars. I find this to be a very interesting piece of data.

Various bacteria have been shown to survive the extreme conditions of vacuum, temperature, and radiation found in space. This second piece of interesting data indicates that bacteria can potentially be transferred from Earth to Mars, where they could survive.

Meteorites are routinely found here on Earth, including a rare few which contain gases matching those found in the atmosphere of Mars. This third piece of interesting data indicates the potential transfer of rocky material from Earth to Mars.

Together, these data indicate that living things could be found on Mars, if they had the opportunity to be transferred there at some time.

This leads us to another piece of data, referred to as the late heavy bombardment. Approximately 4 billion years ago, large rocky fragments were crashing about the inner solar system. The crater-scarred surface of the moon is the most obvious piece of evidence to this time period. Impact craters on Earth and Mars which would have been produced at the same time have been worn away by the erosional processes of the thicker atmospheres and oceans both planets held in the times soon after the bombardment ended. Some of the impacts would have been large enough to sterilize the surface of either planet, evaporating nascent oceans and scattering rocky bits all throughout the solar system. Living cells which had formed on Earth would have been carried into local space on those ejected fragments, only to come raining down later to reseed the cooling planetary surface.

The early environments of Earth and Mars were very much the same. Primordial reducing atmospheres with water oceans would have been found on both. Those rocky seeds which returned life to the sterilized surface of Earth would have also carried life to Mars. The same process would have carried Martian life to Earth, of course, but we have so little evidence from that time period that we really can't say which direction the transfer went.

A few billion years after the late heavy bombardment concluded, we evolved and started asking questions.

The core of Mars had cooled and lost its magnetic field, leading to the Martian atmosphere being stripped away by the persistent solar wind. Without a thick atmosphere, Mars cooled and dried out.  However, even now there is evidence for liquid water on Mars. There is also evidence for methane release into the atmosphere of Mars.

Given how persistent life has been found to be on our planet, living in every place it could possibly find a way to live, I strongly suspect there is life on Mars today. That life would be the last remnants of a formerly thriving biosphere, much like our own, which was descended from the simple forms of life scattered through the solar system during the late heavy bombardment.

Hopefully, we will get the opportunity to go and look while I'm still here to know about it.



References:
  1. Methanogens can survive Martian conditions.
  2. Microbes living in space.
  3. Martian meteorites.
  4. Late heavy bombardment
  5. Martian ocean.
    1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_ocean_hypothesis
    2. http://www.caltech.edu/content/evidence-martian-ocean
    3. http://www.astrobio.net/news-exclusive/new-evidence-for-ancient-ocean-on-mars/
  6. Mars loss of atmosphere.
    1. http://science.time.com/2013/07/23/revealed-how-mars-lost-its-atmosphere/
  7. Association of methane and water seeps on Mars.
  8. Evidence of methane release on Mars.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Astrobiology : Follow the Water

The more we've learned about life on our planet, the more we've come to realize the conditions that we consider livable are only a small fraction of the conditions that living things on this planet are happy to have. The two factors which remain are the need for an energy source and the presence of at least some liquid water.

Almost any sort of energy can be utilized by living things (Light, organic chemical, inorganic chemical, ion gradient, electrical, radiation) even when present in minimal amounts. Energy isn't the limiting factor on our planet

Water is ubiquitous on Earth, from the upper atmosphere to miles below the surface. We find life everywhere we find water, even if that water is horrendously toxic (acid/alkali/heavy-metal/etc.) to us. We find life subsisting between grains of sand subsisting on the trace of moisture provided by dew. We find life in the deepest mines we've dug. We find life living in lakes isolated from the surface for thousands of years of ice.

On Earth, wherever there is water, there is life.



The name of our planet is synonymous with solid ground, but most of the surface of our world is covered in water. From a distance, a glance at our home reveals it to be a water-world first. No other planet (under any definition of 'planet') in our system is anything like it. However, water is common in our part of the universe.

During the formation of a planetary system, volatile elements and compounds are pushed out from the star until ambient space cools enough for those volatiles to condense and freeze. The place where water freezes is referred to as the ice-line and represents the start of the region where icy bodies are formed.

The formation of planets produces a great deal of heat. The kinetic energy of rocky/icy bodies as they merge under gravitational attraction is converted to heat. If the resulting bodies are large enough, they melt and the different components form layers ranging from densest to lightest going from the core to the surface. Water is very low density and so ends up largely on the surface of such bodies. Because they formed far enough out from the sun for water to freeze, the surfaces begin to cool and freeze soon after they form. The residual heat of formation is tremendous, and combined with new heat generated through radioactive decay and tidal interactions can keep temperatures below the surface elevated above the freezing point of water for quite some time.

Several bodies in our solar system appear to have under-ice oceans.

Calisto : science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1998/ast22oct98_2/
Enceledus : www.theguardian.com/science/2014/apr/03/ocean-enceladus-alien-life-water-saturn-moon
Europa : www.space.com/23880-jupiter-moon-europa-hidden-oceans.html

There are potentially living things on these moons, prospering in the warm water of thermal vents or creeping along in the cold waters near the ice.

I can't wait until we go and look.



References :
  1. Follow-the-water.
  2. Light energy for biology.
  3. Electrical energy for biology.
  4. Radiation energy for biology.
  5. Ice-line.
  6. Oxygenation of Earth.
    1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxygenation_Event
  7. Snowball-Earth.
    1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_earth