// Twitter Cards // Prexisting Head The Biologist Is In

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Astrobiology : Follow the Water

The more we've learned about life on our planet, the more we've come to realize the conditions that we consider livable are only a small fraction of the conditions that living things on this planet are happy to have. The two factors which remain are the need for an energy source and the presence of at least some liquid water.

Almost any sort of energy can be utilized by living things (Light, organic chemical, inorganic chemical, ion gradient, electrical, radiation) even when present in minimal amounts. Energy isn't the limiting factor on our planet

Water is ubiquitous on Earth, from the upper atmosphere to miles below the surface. We find life everywhere we find water, even if that water is horrendously toxic (acid/alkali/heavy-metal/etc.) to us. We find life subsisting between grains of sand subsisting on the trace of moisture provided by dew. We find life in the deepest mines we've dug. We find life living in lakes isolated from the surface for thousands of years of ice.

On Earth, wherever there is water, there is life.



The name of our planet is synonymous with solid ground, but most of the surface of our world is covered in water. From a distance, a glance at our home reveals it to be a water-world first. No other planet (under any definition of 'planet') in our system is anything like it. However, water is common in our part of the universe.

During the formation of a planetary system, volatile elements and compounds are pushed out from the star until ambient space cools enough for those volatiles to condense and freeze. The place where water freezes is referred to as the ice-line and represents the start of the region where icy bodies are formed.

The formation of planets produces a great deal of heat. The kinetic energy of rocky/icy bodies as they merge under gravitational attraction is converted to heat. If the resulting bodies are large enough, they melt and the different components form layers ranging from densest to lightest going from the core to the surface. Water is very low density and so ends up largely on the surface of such bodies. Because they formed far enough out from the sun for water to freeze, the surfaces begin to cool and freeze soon after they form. The residual heat of formation is tremendous, and combined with new heat generated through radioactive decay and tidal interactions can keep temperatures below the surface elevated above the freezing point of water for quite some time.

Several bodies in our solar system appear to have under-ice oceans.

Calisto : science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1998/ast22oct98_2/
Enceledus : www.theguardian.com/science/2014/apr/03/ocean-enceladus-alien-life-water-saturn-moon
Europa : www.space.com/23880-jupiter-moon-europa-hidden-oceans.html

There are potentially living things on these moons, prospering in the warm water of thermal vents or creeping along in the cold waters near the ice.

I can't wait until we go and look.



References :
  1. Follow-the-water.
  2. Light energy for biology.
  3. Electrical energy for biology.
  4. Radiation energy for biology.
  5. Ice-line.
  6. Oxygenation of Earth.
    1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxygenation_Event
  7. Snowball-Earth.
    1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_earth

Friday, April 18, 2014

Oxalis and the Red Queen

http://sakaiweller.bio.uci.edu
Breeding in the genus Oxalis is complicated by the presence of multiple flower types, referred to as heterosytly because of differences in the arrangement of styles (the female part of a flower). Oxalis generally have three forms, so they are specifically described as being tristylous.

The physical differences between the flower types match hidden differences in chemistry which limit the effectiveness of pollination between like types. These differences, both physical and chemical, discourage inbreeding.

With three forms, the odds that a vegetatively related plant will have the same form is 1/1 while the odds that any random plant will have the same form is 1/3. Failure of pollination from the same form to succeed results in a strong preference against inbreeding.

Inbreeding reduces genetic diversity and increases the odds of revealing deleterious recessive alleles. Some plants, like Oxalis, have systems to discourage inbreeding, others don't. It isn't clear what drives some species to evolve these systems while others don't, but there is related theory that might be informative…



Why do most plants/animals reproduce by sexual means? Any asexual progeny will get 100% of their
DNA from their mother. Any sexual progeny will get only 50% of their DNA from their mother. Basic evolutionary theory suggests there would be a strong bias towards species reproducing by asexual means. So, why…?

The current theory, backed by years of experimental evidence in different systems (fish, snails, nematodes) is that sexual reproduction allows a species to mix its genome up and keep ahead of parasites, which have much shorter generation times and are rapidly evolving to overwhelm the host immune system.

This is referred to as the "Red Queen Hypothesis", in reference to Lewis Carol's character in "Through the Looking-Glass".

"Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place."



From a theoretical stance, the same pressures which lead to the prevalence of sexual reproduction are likely to be involved in why some plant species have evolved heterostyly. That is to say, a high level of parasitism over evolutionary time periods likely provided the selection pressure leading to the evolution of heterostyly and other mechanisms to minimize inbreeding. Proving this experimentally is a bit harder to do, however, and researchers are actively working on the subject.



What got me interested in this system is that I have two Oxalis triangularis plants I got from a friend. One plant has dark purple leaves with a central lighter mark and pink flowers. The second plant has green leaves and white flowers. I opened up a flower from each plant and discovered they were structured differently.

Plant #1
  • Purple leaves, light mark.
  • Pink flowers.
    • 1' : styles
    • 2' : stamens
    • 3' : stamens
Plant #2
  • Green leaves, smaller.
  • White flowers.
    • 1' : stamens
    • 2' : styles
    • 3' : stamens
If my two plants had happened to have the same flower structure, I wouldn't have looked into the topic of heterostyly. I would have tried crossing the flowers and had the cross fail. I would have assumed the plants were incompatible and not thought to look into it further.

I lucked out and my plants have different flower forms, so my attempts to cross them will likely result in the production of seed. I still have to ponder on the subject of what I might want to breed this species for, but at least I will probably get some interesting combinations of traits in the offspring.



References
  1. Dercole F, Ferriére R, and Rinaldi S. (2010) Chaotic Red Queen coevolution in three-species food chains. Procedings of the Royal Society of Biologists 277:2321-2330.
  2. King KC, Delph LF, Jokela J, and Lively CM. (2009) The Geographic Mosaic of Sex and the Red Queen. Current Biology 19:1438-1441.
  3. Marco DE and Arroyo MTE. (2014) The Breeding System of Oxalis squamata, a Tristylous South American Species. Botanica Acta 111:497-504.
  4. Moran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RCII, and Lively CM. (2011) Running with the Red Queen: Host-Parasite Coevolution Selects for Biparental Sex. Science 333:216-218.
  5. Quental TB and Marshall CR. (2013) How the Red Queen Drives Terrestrial Mammals to Extinction. Science 341:290-292.
  6. Weller SG, Dominguez CA, Molina-Freaner FE, Fornoni J, and Lebuhn G. (2007) The evolution of distyly from tristyly in populations of Oxalis alpina (Oxalidaceae) in the Sky Islands of the Sonoran Desert. American Journal of Botany 94:972-985.
  7. http://radix4roots.blogspot.com/2009/09/ocasional-update-1-to-bee-or-not-to-bee.html
  8. http://radix4roots.blogspot.com/2009/08/flurry-of-flowers.html
  9. http://wettingthebeds.cultivariable.com/2013/07/oca-maximizing-seed-yield-of-crosses.html

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

The Color of Tomatoes


Tomatoes can be found in a wide range of colors (red, pink, orange, yellow, white, green, brown, purple, blue) at your local farmers' market or grocer. Those color differences represent differences in the types and proportions of biologically synthesized pigments. Because tomatoes are such an important crop and adding those pigments to our diet has been shown to give us positive health impacts, researchers have spent some time studying the pathway they use to build the various pigments.

Information about the pathway is spread across numerous papers encompassing decades of research. Not every paper examining the topic will contain all the details of the pathway and there are sometimes conflicting results that have to be negotiated.

The fortunate thing is that these days, more and more of the research behind any particular topic is being placed online. This gives amateur and professional researchers alike access to the same information and either can learn a great deal about many different subjects that may interest them. In general you shouldn't put too much stock in the results of any one paper, but when the results of multiple independent lines of inquiry happen to align, you can be more confident in the inferences you gain.



You might say I'm somewhat interested in the biology of the things I find around me. I decided to look into what was known about the interesting colors found in tomatoes.

The majority of pigments in the tomato are carotenoids. After a bit of research, I generated the figure (at right) to show the biosynthesis pathway which produces these pigments. It illustrates most of what I've learned about the pathway. The figure is probably not entirely comprehensive, as all biological systems are intricate, but it contains sufficient detail to help explain the range of fruit colors seen in tomatoes.

You can dig through the references at the end of this post if you're interested in where I got the information. In fact, I would highly recommend you do so, if you're interested in the biology of tomato color. If you've never read primary literature, you should be aware that you may have to read through dozens (or hundreds) of papers to get a solid grasp of a new topic in this way.

In my figure, I use double arrows to indicate higher reaction rates, as inferred from preferred branches of the reaction pathway or intermediates which are known but don't appear in large amounts. The colored components of the pathway are highlighted in something approaching their true colors in chromatography experiments (and in the fruit) to make it simpler to visualize how mutations might impact fruit color.

Energy flows through biosynthetic pathways. Though each enzymatic reaction is reversible, the overall progression of the pathway is driven by the enthalpy gradient across its components. When a mutation breaks part of a pathway, it blocks that flow of energy, resulting in a build-up of the chemical intermediates just before the break as well as a reduction or absence of those intermediates after the break.



The following figures are close-up versions of the main figure above, highlight the placement of a series of mutations in the pathway which result in color changes in the flesh of tomatoes. The mutations are indicated by a large negative or positive sign, highlighted in red, at the location of the change to the pathway.

Mutant : 'r'
The first major mutation (left) is responsible for the difference between red and yellow tomatoes. The wild-type dominant allele of the gene leads to the production of lycopene, so the gene is named 'red' ('R'). The recessive allele ('r') results in an overall decrease in the production of carotenoids. The decrease is not uniform; some carotenoids are suppressed more than others, resulting in an overall yellow appearance.
Mutant : 'gf'

The second major mutation (right), in combination with the 'r' mutation just described, is the most common cause of green-fleshed tomatoes. The recessive mutant allele leads to green flesh, so it is named 'green-flesh' ('gf'). The wild-type dominant allele of the gene ('Gf') allows the breakdown of chlorophyll and other photosynthetic components during the ripening process.

A minor mutation produces green ripe fruit by interfering with the ability of the fruit ripening system to respond to ethylene. Ethylene is a common plant hormone involved in maturation/ripening/senescence, so this mutation keeps some aspects of the normal fruit ripening from happening. This dominant mutant allele is called 'Green-ripe' ('Gr') and results in a green tomato with a red heart. This mutation doesn't impact the pigment pathway, but instead where different components of it are activated. It is not clear if it interacts with the 'red' ('r') locus in a similar way to the more common 'gf' mutation.

Mutant : 't'
The third major mutation (left) is responsible for the most common form of orange tomato. The recessive mutant allele is named 'tangerine' ('t') (after the orange variety "Tangerine" where the gene was found). The wild-type dominant allele of the gene ('T') allows the final synthesis of lycopene. The mutation results in the build-up of orange prolycopene, as well as zeta-carotene in smaller amounts.
Mutant : 'B'

Another minor mutation (right) results in a less common types of orange tomato. The dominant allele is named 'beta-carotene' ('Beta', 'B') because it leads to a large increase in beta-carotene and a decrease in lycopene. The position of this gene in the pathway and the mechanism of the mutation isn't entirely clear, but the data seems to suggest the gene is involved in the conversion of lycopene to gamma-carotene and the mutation results in increased activity.




The color of the epidermis also impacts the apparent color of tomatoes, but the mutations impacting this system are less well-understood. The typical red tomato has a transparent-yellow epidermis, giving the associated gene its name 'yellow' ('Y'). A common recessive mutation ('y') results in a clear epidermis. The epidermis color overlaid on the flesh color results in the perceptual differences is red/pink and brown/purple tomatoes.

Recently, breeders have been been working with genes that result in the production of dark purple anthocyanins in the skin of tomatoes. The two genes 'anthocyanin-fruit' ('Aft') and 'atroviolaceum' ('atv') were introgressed into cultivated tomatoes from Solanum chilense and Solanum cheesmaniae, respectively. A less common gene 'Abg' was introgressed into cultivated tomatoes from Solanum lycopersicoides, but is less useful/available because it has a recessive lethal character. All three genes are described in Mes et al, 2008.

Frogsleep Farms
There is evidence for lycopene production in the skin of some tomatoes, resulting in an opaque-red skin. The details of the genetics have yet to be worked out and published, but Frogsleep Farms has found some lovely examples. The fruit at right appears to have the genotype 'r' for yellow fruit flesh color, but has intense lycopene-red in the epidermis. (The first photo on this page shows another fruit, illustrating high-lycopene opaque-red skin.)

In my personal gardening, I've noticed an opaque-red epidermis in fruit produced by the micro-tomato variety 'Tiny Tim'. This variety was derived in part from the wild tomato Solanum pimpinellifolium, which also seems to have an opaque-red fruit epidermis. Potential variations might eventually be found which have opaque-yellow or opaque-orange skin, so I find the idea of exploring the traits of fruit skin color to be exciting.



wild-type
Another set of genes impact where pigment is produced in the fruit. A wild-type tomato has a dark-green shoulder when immature, which delays ripening at the top of the fruit. Common modern market tomatoes have the 'uniform ripening' ('u') trait which shows even ripening, but reduced overall color. This gene is a transcription factor which normally guides chlorophyll distribution and abundance in unripe fruit.

[dgdg] vs. [uu]
The 'dark green' ('dg') mutation produces a dark green immature fruit and increased levels of carotenoids in the ripe fruit. The 'high pigment 2' ('hp2') mutant is now considered to be a different allele of the same gene as 'dg', which is now known to be the tomato homolog of the Arabidopsis DEETIOLATED1 gene. This gene is involved in the perception of light levels and impacts morphogenesis.

The cause of bicolor, striped, and spotted tomatoes are less well understood. Striped tomatoes using the 'green stripe' ('gs') mutation are pretty common these days. Another type of striping is due to a dominant allele ('Ufs') of the 'uniform ripening' gene. Spotting is generally considered a commercial defect, but the 'gold fleck' ('Gfk') trait is an interesting look when it is highly expressed.



In the following section, I give limited descriptions of the different color categories of tomatoes. This description includes the genotypes and example varieties associated with them when they're commercially available.

 'RR' (Kachanovsky et al, 2012)
Red Tomatoes

The typical red tomato is pigmented by a large amount of lycopene and lesser amounts of beta-carotene, driven by the 'red' ('R') gene. The skin of these tomatoes also has a yellow pigment driven by the 'yellow' ('Y') gene.
genotype = [RR; YY]
example = "Red Barn".

Pink Tomatoes

These have the lycopene (red) and beta-carotene (orange) of typical tomatoes, but they have clear skin from a recessive allele 'y'. This results in the tomatoes appearing pink when compared to the typical red tomato.
genotype = [RR; yy]
example = "Dwarf Champion Improved".

Orange Tomatoes
 'RR; tt' & 'rr; tt' (Kachanovsky et al, 2012)


The most common type of orange tomato is caused by the 'tangerine' ('t') mutation. The skin can be clear or yellow.
genotype = [RR; YY/yy; tt] or [rr; YY/yy; tt]
example = "Earl of Edgecombe", "Elbe", "Tangerine".

A less common type of orange tomato is caused by the 'Beta-carotene' ('Beta','B') mutation. The skin can be clear or yellow.
genotype = [RR; YY/yy; BB]
example = "Caro-Rich","Jaune Flammée".

 'rr' (Kachanovsky et al, 2012)
Yellow/White Tomatoes

Yellow tomatoes are caused by a recessive allele ('r') of the 'red' gene. The skin can be clear or yellow.
genotype = [rr; YY/yy; TT]
examples = "Yellow Pear".

White tomatoes appear to be caused by a stronger recessive allele ('r-') of the 'red' gene.
genotype = [r-r-; YY/yy; TT]
example = "Dr Carolyn", "White Queen".

Green Tomatoes

"Coeur de Surpriz" showing 'Gr'.
Grown by Mary Hope.
The most common type of green tomato is caused by the recessive 'green-flesh' ('gf') mutation in combination with the 'r' mutation.
genotype = [rr; YY/yy; TT; gfgf]
example = "Green Zebra".

A less common type of green tomato is caused by the dominant 'Green-ripe' ('Gr') mutation. This mutation leaves the center of the fruit to ripen normally, resulting in green/'purple' outer regions and a yellow/red center. There are heirloom varieties around with this trait, but I haven't been able to find many specific names.
genotype = [GrGr]
example = "Coeur de Surpriz".

Brown Tomatoes

These are pigmented by a large amount of lycopene and lesser amounts of beta-carotene, driven by the 'red' ('R') gene, as well as by chlorophyll from the 'green-flesh' ('gf') gene. The skin of these tomatoes has a yellow pigment driven by the 'yellow' ('Y') gene.
genotype = [RR; YY; TT; gfgf]
example = "Black Russian", "Brazilian Beauty".

Purple Tomatoes

These are pigmented by a large amount of lycopene and lesser amounts of beta-carotene, driven by the 'red' ('R') gene, as well as by chlorophyll from the 'green-flesh' ('gf') gene. The skin of these tomatoes is clear driven by the mutant allele ('y') of the 'yellow' gene.
genotype = [RR; yy; TT; gfgf]
example = "Black Cherry", "Black Krim".

"Indigo Rose" showing 'Aft' and 'atv'.
Blue Tomatoes 

These have anthocyanin expression in the skin, driven by the combination of 'anthocyanin fruit' ('Aft') and 'atroviolaceum' ('atv') genes.
genotype = [AftAft; atvatv]
example = "Indigo Rose".

Black Tomatoes

There is no specific genetics to describe for this category. 'Black' is often used to describe those that I would call 'brown' or 'purple'. (The example varieties I list for the 'brown' and 'purple' groups have names starting with 'black'.) I wouldn't be surprised if the 'blue' tomatoes end up being described this way, since they're actually the closest to black we're likely to get.



Bicolor Tomatoes

The 'bicolor' trait is caused by an allele ('ry') of the 'R' gene which activates of the carotenoid pathway in some parts of the fruit and not others. This results in streaks of red and yellow throughout the fruit and skin.
genotype = [ryry]

Striped Tomatoes

"Green Zebra" showing 'gs'.
Dark green stripes on immature fruit, driven by the recessive 'green-stripe' ('gs') gene. This trait has become very popular lately and is responsible for the stripes seen on many heirloom-type varieties available in markets.
genotype = [gsgs]
examples = "Green Zebra", "Striped Roman".
tomato showing 'UFs'

Dark green radial stripes, opposite of each locule, driven by a dominant allele ('UFs') of the 'uniform-ripening' gene. Frogsleep Farm has some nice photos of fruit with the pattern mixed with anthocyanin production, as well as a nice bit of discussion of the trait, but there seem to be few commercially available varieties with this form of striping.
genotype = [UFsUFs]
examples = "Siberian Tiger", "Arbuznyi".

Spotted Tomatoes

Yellow spots on ripe fruit, driven by the dominant 'gold-fleck' ('Gdf') gene.   Frogsleep Farms has some interesting images showing this trait.
genotype = [GdfGdf]
examples = "Scabitha".



References:
  1. Apel W & Bock R. (2009) Enhancement of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Transplastomic Tromatoes by Induced Lycopene-to-Provitamin A Conversion. Plant Physiology 151:59-66. 
  2. Barry CS, McQuinn RP, Thompson AJ, Seymour GB, Grierson D, and Giovannoni JJ. (2005) Ethylene Insensitivity Conferred by the Green-ripe and Never-ripe 2 Ripening Mutants of Tomato. Plant Physiology 138:267-275.
  3. Barry CS, McQuinn RP, Chung M, Besuden A, & Giovannoni JJ. (2008) Amino Acid Substitutions in Homologs of the STAY-GREEN Protein are Responsible for the green-flesh and chlorophyll-retainer Mutations of Tomato and Pepper. Plant Physiology 147:179-187.
  4. Fantini E, Falcone G, Frusciante S, Giliberto L, & Giuliano G. (2013) Dissection of Tomato Lycopene Biosynthesis Through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing. Plant Physiology 163:986-998.
  5. Gonzali S, Mazzucato A, & Perata P. (2009) Anthocyanin pathway in tomatoes. Trends in Plant Science 14:237-241.
  6. Issacson T, Ronen G, Zamir D, and Hirschberg J. (2002) Cloning of tangerine from Tomato Reveals a Carotenoid Isomerase Essential for the Production of Beta-Carotene and Xanthophylls in Plants. Plant Cell 14:333-342.
  7. Jenkins JA & Mackinny G. (1951) Color in Tomatoes. California Agriculture  Feb 13-14.
  8. Jenkins JA & Mackinny G. (1953) Inheritance of Carotenoid Differences in the Tomato Hybrid Yellow x Tangerine. Genetics 38:107-116.
  9. Jenkins JA & Mackinny G. (1955) Carotenoids of the Apricot Tomato and its Hybrids with Yellow and Tangerine. Genetics 40:715-720.
    1. http://www.genetics.org/content/40/5/715.full.pdf
    2. Carotenoid characterization of 'apricot' ('at') mutation.
    3. Data suggests alternate pathway to generate beta-carotene.
  10. Kachanovsky DE, Filler S, Isaacson T, & Hirschberg J. (2012) Epistasis in tomato color mutations involves regulation of phytoene synthase 1 expression by cis-carotenoids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 109:19021-19026.
  11. Levin I, Frankel P, Gilboa N, Tanny S, and Lalazar A. (2003) The tomato dark green mutation is a novel allele of the tomato homolog of the DEETIOLATED1 gene. Theoretical Applied Genetics 106:454-460.
  12. Lesley JW and Lesley MM. () Linkage of sh (sherry).
  13. Ma Q, Du W, Brandizzi F, Giovannoni JJ, & Barry CS. (2012) Differential Control of Ethylene Responses by GREEN-RIPE and GREEN-RIPE LIKE1 Provides Evidence for Distinct Ethylene Signaling Modules in Tomato. Plant Physiology 160:1968-1984.
  14. Mes PJ, Boches P, & Myers JR. (2008) Characterization of Tomatoes Expressing Anthocyanin in the Fruit. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 133:262-269.
  15. Paran I, van der Knaap E. (2007) Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:3841-3852.
    • http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/14/3841.full
    • 'Del' has increased expression of lycopene-delta-cyclase, resulting in conversion of lycopene to delta-carotene.
    • 'Del' was introgressed from Solanum pennelii.
    • 'Beta' was introgressed from Solanum cheesmaniae.
    • 'old gold' is allelic to 'Beta', but eliminates Beta-carotene production.
  16. Powell ALT, Nguyen CV, Hill T, Cheng KL, Figueroa-Balderas R, Aktas H, Ashrafi H, Pons C, Fern ández-Muñoz R, Vicente A, Lopez-Baltazar J, Barry CS, Liu Y, Chetalat R, Granell A, Deynze AV, Giovannoni JJ, and Bennett AB. (2012) Uniform ripening Encodes a Golden 2-like Transcription Factor Regulating Tomato Fruit Chloroplast Development. Science 336:1711-1715.
  17. Tomes ML, Quackenbush FW, Nelson OE Jr, & North B. (1953) The Inheritance of Carotenoid Pigment Systems in the Tomato. Genetics 38:117-127.
    • http://www.genetics.org/content/38/2/117.full.pdf
    • Identification of pigments found in red/yellow/B-orange/tangerine fruit.
    • Yellow skin is a non-carotenoid pigment.
    • Yellow differs from red mostly in across-the-board reduction in pigment.
    • Tangerine fruit contains mostly zeta-carotene and prolycopene.
    • Red fruit contains mostly lycopene and less beta-carotene.
    • 'Beta'-orange fruit contains mostly beta-carotene and less lycopene.
    • [r locus < t locus < Beta locus] in pathway.
  18. Tomes ML. (1966) The Competitive Effect of the Beta- and Delta-Carotene Genes on Alpha- and Beta-Ionone Ring Formation in the Tomato. Genetics 56:227-232.
  19. Wann EV. Reduced Plant Growth in Tomato Mutants high pigment and dark green Partially Overcome by Gibberelin. (1995) HortScience 30:379.
  20. http://forums.gardenweb.com/forums/load/tomato/msg1118251224332.html
    • Mention of 'B' mutant variety.
  21. http://treecropsresearch.org/heirloom-tomatoes/
    • List of several varieties with high prolycopene => 'tangerine' mutant varieties.
    • Data suggests secondary pathway to beta-carotene.
  22. http://tgc.ifas.ufl.edu/vol7/v7p14.html
    • Bicolor trait.
  23. http://tgc.ifas.ufl.edu/vol6/v6p33a.html
    • Bicolor trait.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

New Orleans

I'm in New Orleans most of the week for the 12th ASM Conference on Candida and Candidiasis. Today I presented a short talk about a genome sequence analysis tool I have been constructing. The main purpose of the tool is to provide the user with a large-scale overview about what changes have occurred in the strain, when compared to another strain (which may or may not be the reference genome for that species).

Most biologists don't have the solid grasp of mathematics or computer programming needed build such a tool, but they can recognize how the tool can help them when presented with what it does. More than one associate came to me afterwards and relayed stories of what they saw in the audience while I was talking. (The associates had seen me present on the topic, or have already been using the tool, and so didn't really need to follow my talk.) One researcher was observed taking notes on her copy of the presentation schedule, placing check-marks by each talk after it concluded. At the end of my talk, she circled my section enthusiastically. I expect she will be finding me to ask questions over the next few days.

Last night I was talking with an associate about some of the quirks involved in the data he was looking to analyze. He asked me, "How does it feel to be the only person doing this?" I was somewhat surprised by this, as I had not put serious thought to the matter.

Long before I started grad school, I had heard it was a grad student's job to become the world expert on something. Since we're investigating things that are not known, it really isn't too hard to do…  but I hadn't thought about it in a while and nobody had ever pointed it out to me.

I do wonder what I've gotten myself into with this project, as it could be something the Candida research community might want to have around for a while. As I'm the only developer on the project, I may be attached to it for some time. Once I graduate, however, I don't know how much of my time I will want to be donating. Perhaps I can get paid to assist others with their data analysis in a consultant level. This would allow me to have a day job and still contribute to the research community.

Friday, March 21, 2014

Evolution and Tomatoes

Mutations occur all the time and are random in nature. Most mutations have minimal impact, but some are dramatic. A mutation isn't intrinsically negative or positive, but becomes so in the context of how it impacts the survival and reproduction of an organism in the specific environment it finds itself.

Selection, the biased survival of certain genotypes over others, trims the random mutations to those that work. 'Artificial' selection is what we call it when we make choices about which organisms continue to reproduce. 'Natural' selection is what we call it when it is the undirected interactions with the environment and other organisms that determines which organisms continue to reproduce. There is no real difference between 'artificial' and 'natural' selection. They both push organisms around, changing how they work and what they do, in ways that are to the advantage of the organisms themselves.

The plants and animals that we have 'artificially' selected have had incredible increases to their populations. There are far more dogs than there are wolves. There are far more wheat/corn plants than there ever were of the wild species from which they were derived. You could describe the development of our domesticates as their independent evolution into a very profitable niche…  us.



U/U
I like colorful and tasty tomatoes. Given that tomatoes represent ~$2 billion in farm revenues per year in the USA, I'm not the only one. Wild tomatoes and early market varieties develop with a darker green shoulder (at right) that ripens to the final red a bit slower than the rest of the fruit. By the time the green shoulder has ripened completely, the bottom of the fruit is already beginning to get soft. For home-grown tomatoes, this isn't a problem, since you're going to be eating it soon after plucking it from the plant at its most vibrant red ripeness. For commercial tomatoes, by the time the top has fully ripened, it has become too soft at the bottom for shipping. The result is that commercial tomatoes were picked and shipped before they were ripe and would appear partially green in the stores.

u/u
At some point before the 1930s, a farmer in the USA noticed a plant producing tomatoes that didn't have green shoulders (at left) and that ripened uniformly from top-to-bottom. The tomatoes could be picked when they started to go red and would ripen evenly all over by the time they reached the grocer.

In the market those tomatoes that still had the green-shoulders didn't sell as well as the all-red neighbors. They didn't look as ripe and couldn't compete. Commercial plant breeders saw the trait as the boon it was and soon the uniform-ripening trait (u) was bred into most commercial tomatoes everywhere. In the environment of the home garden, the uniform-ripening trait didn't provide any advantage to growers and the trait remains rare in the (heirloom) tomato varieties passed down along family lines.

Tomatoes still went soft on the way to stores, costing the industry a fortune in lost revenue. In the 1960s, a tomato was found by Henry Munger (a professor of plant breeding at Cornell) that showed strongly delayed ripening. This ripening-inhibition (rin) trait, when bred into commercial tomatoes, resulted in plants which produced fruit that remained hard for a longer time. Because they didn't go soft during ripening, they could be shipped with fewer losses. This made it cheaper to get a tomato to market and soon the trait had been bred into most commercial varieties. The ripening of these tomatoes is sped up by exposure of ethylene gas (a common plant development hormone), so they can be perfectly ripe upon arrival at the store.



In 1974, researchers realized that the ripening-inhibition (rin) trait resulted in changes in the chlorophyll and carotenoid composition of the fruit, in addition to the obvious inhibition of ripening. Several years later in 2002, the rin trait was identified as being caused by a mutation which impacted two adjacent transcription factors central to the development of fruit and flowers in tomatoes.

In 2012, other researchers realized that the uniform-ripening (u) trait was also caused by a mutation impacting a transcription factor. The broken transcription factor resulted in reduced production of carbohydrates and carotenoids in the fruit, in addition to the apparent change in ripening.

That transcription factor changes were found in both important-market traits is interesting and highlights their potential importance in other traits of interest.



At some point during this process, people began to notice that the tomatoes bought from the store didn't compare to those they or their friends grew at home. This realization has contributed to the recent resurgence of interest in heirloom tomatoes (and other crops) that have been maintained within families who saved seeds over the years. In the case of tomatoes, many of the varieties originated well before the 1930s when the story I tell above began.

The combination of mutation and selection is a very creative and powerful process, but our interests can only direct this process if we're involved in it. If we let others do it for us, it is their interests that will direct the process, as is now evident in the case of tomatoes.



An important aspect of my gardening philosophy is that anyone who grows vegetables should also save seeds. This keeps the interests of the gardener involved in the evolution of the crops they grow and, over the longer term, ensures the vegetables remain worthwhile (by diverse definitions) to grow.

Now that we know how the market-oriented selection of tomatoes has led to their decline, there is the potential to breed varieties which have the better flavor we associate with the heirloom varieties and the traits that make a tomato a market-sucess. However, even if market tomatoes are returned to the glory they should have always been, it will remain important for home growers to keep saving seeds if their interests are to remain involved in the plant's future.



  1. uniform-ripening (u)
  2. ripening-inhibition (rin)

Monday, March 10, 2014

The Genetics of Backcrossing

"Tatume" squash.
"Lemon" squash.
A user over at the Tomatoville forums recently asked for thoughts on a squash breeding project they're thinking of starting. Tomatoville is generally focussed on all-things-tomato, but it has a large range of people interested in breeding of other garden vegetables (including squash).

The goal of the proposed project is to combine the color, flavor, and production of "Lemon" with the vining habit, vigor, and insect resistance of "Tatume". They were seeking input on what strategy to pursue with the F1 plants; backcrossing to "Tatume" or selfing.

Backcrossing is generally used to transfer a limited number of traits from one genetic background to another, without dragging along unrelated genetic baggage. This technique was used to transfer anthocyanin pigment production from wild tomato relatives (Solanum cheesmanii & S. chilense) into the garden tomato (S. lysopersicum var. "Indigo Rose") [1]. It was also used to transfer the red factor from the Pine Siskin (Carduellis cucullata) into Canary birds (Serinus canaria domestica) [2]. In both cases, there were many other traits of the donor species which were not desired in the final product and that were successfully filtered out via backcrossing.

     1. http://frogsleapfarm.blogspot.com/2011/03/anthocyanin-fruit-in-tomatoes.html
     2. http://www.avianweb.com/redfactorcanaries.html



The genetics of squash color is relatively well worked out: two loci interact to produce green (wwgg), yellow (wwG_), or white (W_G_) immature fruit [3]. The genetics of vining habit is also known: one locus produces bush (Bu_) or trailing (bubu) vine habit [4]. The genetics of flavor, yield, and many other traits are less well understood.

If you don't know the genetics of the traits you're interested in, you should first grow out a reasonable number of F2 progeny in order to characterize the inheritance patterns. Growing 20 or so F2s from a selfed-F1 might not give you every expected combination of traits, but it will allow you to examine the ratios of each of the traits you're interested in. The recessive version of each trait will be in the minority.

     3. http://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc431/mendel/mendel6.htm
     4. http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/40/6/1620.full.pdf



Backcrossing has specific consequences to a breeding program depending on the genetics of the trait(s) you're looking to transfer.

Dominant : color genetics.

"Tatume" x "Lemon"
P1 : (wwgg) green x (wwGG) yellow
F1 : (wwGg) yellow


"Tatume" x F1
P2 :  (wwgg) green x (wwGg) yellow
BC1 : (wwGg) yellow + (wwgg) green
Recessive : hypothetical flavor genetics.

"Tatume" x "Lemon"
P1 : (BiBi) bitter x (aa) sweet
F1 : (Bibi) bitter
F2 : 3 (1 BiBi; 2 Bibi) bitter + 1 (bibi) sweet

"Tatume" x F1
P2 : (BiBi) bitter x (Bibi) bitter
BC1F1 : (1 BiBi; 1 Bibi) bitter

"Tatume" x F2
P2 : (BiBi) bitter x (bibi) bitter
BC1F1 : (Bibi) bitter

In the dominant case, it is apparent which of the progeny carry the trait of interest. You can immediately choose which plants to use in the next stage.

In the recessive case, it is not apparent which of the backcross progeny carry the trait of interest.  You will have a 50% chance of losing the recessive allele you're interested in during every backcross generation. The solution to this is to screen a set of F2s in every cycle to find progeny carrying two copies of the recessive allele.

Dominant : color genetics.

"Tatume" x BC1
P3 :  (wwgg) green x (wwGg) yellow
BC2 : (wwGg) yellow + (wwgg) green
Recessive : hypothetical flavor genetics.
"Tatume" x BC1F2
P3 : (BiBi) bitter x (bibi) sweet
BC2F1 : (Bibi) bitter
BC2F2 : 3 (1 BiBi; 2 Bibi) bitter + 1 (bibi) sweet

After several cycles of recurrent backcrossing with a dominant trait, the final progeny will be very much like the backcross parent ("Tatume"), but with the exception that they will have both dominant and recessive alleles for the selected locus. A round of selfing to produce F2s, then another round of selfing to produce F2 families, then selecting those F2 families which did not produce any green squash will get rid of the undesired recessive allele from the "Tatume" parent line.

After several cycles of recurrent backcrossing with a recessive trait, the final progeny will be very much like the backcross parent ("Tatume"), with the exception that they will have two recessive alleles at the selected locus. No further selection will be required to stabilize the line, but it will have taken twice as many years to get here compared to the case of transferring a dominant trait.



If you instead screen large numbers of F2s from the original "Tatume" x "Lemon" cross, you might find the combination of dominant and recessive traits you're looking for in the second year. The recessive traits will already be stabilized, while the dominant traits will require more work. Self each F2 plant and save the seeds separately to make F2 families. Growing out the F2 families will let you see which F2 plants had a recessive allele hiding under the desired dominant trait. In addition, this method will let you examine a large number of combinations of genes you weren't expecting in advance.

If one parent was poisonous or had many other negative traits, you would get very few edible progeny and your time would probably be better spent using a backcrossing strategy to filter out everything except the few traits you're interested in transferring.

Both parents in the proposed project are highly edible and only differ in a few charismatic traits, so the vast majority of F2 progeny will be highly edible and have some combination of those traits. In this case, the potential to uncover interesting combinations of hidden alleles out-ranks the limited potential to produce inedible progeny.

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Domesticating Garlic Mustard

Garlic Mustard (Aliara petiolate) is considered a noxious invasive weed throughout North America. Very few animals find the garlicky taste palatable (deer will preferentially browse on native plants), so it spreads unchecked and can take over in areas where it gets a foothold. It was brought to this continent by European immigrants, who planted it in their gardens for use as a potherb (imagine boiled spinach).

The plant is entirely edible, from root to flower. Analysis has shown it to be high in vitamin C, fiber, and other nutrients. Garlic Mustard does contain cyanogenic compounds and so should be cooked to break down these compounds if it is consumed routinely. This trait puts it in the good company of lima beans, cassava, and flaxseed.

As long as you don't routinely eat it raw in large quantities, you shouldn't have a problem with the cyanide levels you would be exposed to. Remember, the dose makes the poison.



The Lettuce (Lactuca scariola/serriola) and Endive (Cichorium intybus) we enjoy as delectable salad greens were once spiny, bitter weeds. These plants have been shaped by our desires and have hitched their evolutionary destiny to our own.  This process is referred to as 'domestication' and can happen with or without the conscious action of the people growing the plants.

The idea of domesticating random plants amuses me. Garlic Mustard already makes a decent vegetable and I suspect that with some work, it could be made into an excellent vegetable.

A key requirement for breeding a new variety of a plant is having some genetic diversity to work with. To get this starting diversity in Garlic Mustard, I could wait a few hundred years in cryostasis while my henchmen scour the planet looking for some interesting variations of the plant… or I could induce a bunch of mutations and be done with this step in a few years.

I've decided to go with the quick option.
'Kinnow' -> 'KinnowLS'

Agricultural research labs routinely use various chemicals, particle radiation, or x-rays to induce mutations in plants. They then screen the mutated results for improvements in some characteristic to make the plant more useful/tasty/nutritious/etc. The process is known generally as 'mutation breeding' and has been widely used since the 1970s. The seedless orange in the figure at right was generated by mutating the seeded orange, then screening through the mutated progeny for the desired improvements.

I don't feel like dealing with aggressively mutagenic chemicals and I don't have ready access to a particle accelerator or an X-ray generating machine, but I do have ready access to another form of mutagenic radiation. Ultraviolet (UV) light is the component of sunlight which is responsible for giving us a sun-burn. The thymine bases in our DNA absorbs the UV light and becomes chemically altered.   The alterations can result in base mismatches or strand breaks as the excess energy from the UV dissipates. Shortwave UV, or UV-C, is particularly good at damaging DNA and can be produced by commercially available bactericidal-UV fluorescent light bulbs.

Garlic Mustard seeds are small enough that sufficient UV-C light should get to the embryo and cause the mutations I'm looking for. There's no risk to me, as long as I don't get exposed to the UV-C bulbs, so it is a major plus over X-rays or mutagenic chemicals.



After acquiring some UV-C lamps and setting up a light-tight enclosure (so I don't sunburn my eyes/etc.), I will have to determine the radiation dosage needed to successfully mutate the seeds. A reasonable method is to irradiate batches of seeds for different times, then compare their germination to an un-irradiated control. The dosage corresponding to a 50% reduction in germination will give me the most bang for my buck…  producing lots of mutations, but still giving me lots of viable seeds to work with.

Damaged DNA by itself is not a mutation. The damaged DNA has to be repaired with some new change to count. A method to encourage the repair of the damaged DNA is to wake up the seeds by soaking them in water a few days before mutating them, allowing them to restart their paused metabolism. This should result in a higher survival rate with more actual mutations, rather than dead seeds with shredded DNA.

Any dominant-effect mutations will be apparent the first generation after mutation (M1), but many mutations are likely to be recessive and will only become apparent in later generations (M2, etc.).



The first thing to consider relates to the current problems caused by the plant. It is highly invasive, spreading seeds everywhere and taking over wild-lands. An ideal garden vegetable would be a bit more polite and stay where we want it. How would we select for a more polite weed?

A primary difference between wild and domesticated plants is that wild plants drop their seed (referred to as 'shattering') and domesticated plants retain them until we intervene. This single trait would go a long way to convert the noxious, invasive weed into a polite garden inhabitant.

Fortunately, all I need to do to get this trait is to break the existing system the plant uses to drop its seeds. Since I'm going with a mutagenic approach, which essentially is breaking things randomly, I can expect to break this system in some plants. They key detail is to actively screen the M1 and M2 plants for modifications to the shattering trait and then to only work with their descendants. This will keep my potentially interesting garden plants from spreading and taking over wild lands like the wild Garlic Mustard plant.



At this stage of the project, I will have to develop some idea of what my breeding goals are.

Food quality related traits are likely to be easy to examine and select for. Larger roots/leaves/flowers? More delicate, sweeter leaves? Making the plant better for something that people already use it for will produce it something that someone will want to use.   People already use Garlic Mustard for a wide range of recipes, so there are many potential directions.